Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Kumaresh Babu, J
S.Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Andavarselvam – Respondent
Appeal Suit|O.S.No.22/1997
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's failure to appear. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's observation on repeated absence. (Para 2) |
| 3. appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 09.03.2026, there was no representation on the side of the appellants, either in person or through the learned counsel. Hence, this Court directed the matter to be listed on
23.03.2026.
2. Again, when the matter was taken up for hearing on 23.03.2026, there was no representation on the side of the appellants. In order to grant one more opportunity, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter on 24.03.2026 (today) under the caption “For Dismissal”.
3. Even today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on the side of the appellants. Hence, it is evident that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, this appeal suit stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
