Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
Aswin – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the incident leading to the appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding bail and their implications. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's consideration of facts and previous judicial conduct regarding bail. (Para 6) |
| 4. final decision to grant bail with conditions. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
The present Criminal Appeal has been filed against the order dated
04.03.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (PoA) Act, Tiruppur, in C.M.P.No.34 of 2026, dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner seeking bail in Crime No.21 of 2026. 2. The case of the prosecution as per the third respondent/de facto complainant is that he was taking care of the farmland owned by one Gopinath, by residing there along with one Karthik. Owing to an existing civil dispute between the owner of the de facto complainant and Aswin/A1/appellant of Pethappampatti, on 27.01.2026, at about 1.00 a.m., the appellant, along with his associates, came to the farmland, where the de facto complainant was working, in a JCB vehicle, cars and tractors. They abused the de facto complainant by calling him by his caste name, assaulted both the de fact
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
