SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24982

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Rajendrakumar Premchand – Appellant
Versus
Sundariammal – Respondent
Civil Revision Petition|Article 227 of Constitution of India|O.S. CFR No.3560 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR.M.Rajasekar

The court directed the trial judge to take the case on file as the defects in the plaint were complied with, ensuring proper judicial process under the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act.

Headnote:This judgment analyzes the petitioner's appeal under Article 227 of the Constitution regarding a docket order. The petitioner sought declaration relief under Section 25(d) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, which led to the trial judge's non-acceptance of the case due to various grounds. However, it was concluded that the defects were duly complied with, and the trial judge was directed to take the case on file. The final outcome was the disposition of the Civil Revision Petition with no costs.

Table of Content
1. compliance with necessary procedures for case filing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's directive to the trial judge to accept the case. (Para 3)
3. conclusion on the disposition of the civil revision petition. (Para 4)

ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition seeking to set aside the docket order dated 17.02.2026 made in O.S. CFR No.3560 of 2026 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Nilgiris, Udhagamandalam.

2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the petitioner had filed a suit for the relief of declaration under Section 25(d) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, in respect of certain sale deeds, seeking rectification of survey numbers as against the defendants. However, the learned trial Judge was not inclined to take the case on file and returned the plaint on various grounds. Thereafter, all the defects pointed out were duly complied with, but even then, the plaint was not taken on file. He further submitted that the plaintiff had also clarified all the issues raised. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

3. On consideration, it is seen that the plaintiff has approached the Court by paying the requisite court fee and has properly described the relief sought in the plaint along with necessary pleadings. This Court is satisfied that the same is sufficient to take the case on file and that, prima facie, the defects pointed out have been duly complied with. Therefore, the learned trial Judge is directed to take the case on file within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. The Registry is directed to return the original plaint immediately. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top