Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
R.Vishnu Priya – Appellant
Versus
The District Revenue Officer, Office of the Collectorate, Erode District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ challenged based on respondent's rejection of the application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. violation of natural justice due to non-speaking order. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. writ petition is disposed of with guidelines. (Para 6) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 28.10.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent, rejecting the petitioner’s application seeking grant of patta in her name for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition.
2. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order is passed against the 4th respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with by this Court.
3. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice and on the ground that the impugned order is a non-speaking order.
4. As seen from the impugned order, dated 28.10.2024, no reasons have been given by the 2nd respondent for rejecting the petitioner’s application seeking grant of patta in her name. Since the impugned order is a non-speaking order, and has been passed in violation of the principl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
