Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.Kumarappan, J
P.Saradha – Appellant
Versus
J.Selvarajan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner challenges the sentence regarding cheque liability. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. grounds for revision and willingness to deposit are presented. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. conditions for suspension of sentence and order issued. (Para 6) |
ORDER
The petitioner has preferred the above revision challenging the judgment dated 16.07.2025 passed by the learned VI Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in C.A.No.595 of 2023, whereby, the judgment of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track Court – V, Saidapet, Chennai, dated 12.09.2023 in C.C.No.4506 of 2019 was confirmed and the appeal was dismissed. The conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner is as follows:-
Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and under section
255(2) of Cr.P.C., petitioner is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for eight months and to pay compensation amount of Rs.11,80,000/-; and under section 357(3) of Cr.P.C., in default of payment of compensation, the accused is directed to under go simple imprisonment for three months.
2. The instant petition has been filed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner.
3. It is the case of the respondent/complainant that
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
