SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
B.Govindasamy S/o.Late.Bhagavathygounder – Appellant
Versus
The District Revenue Officer Tiruppur District – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.M.Hareesh, for M/s.PV Law Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 to 4, Mr.N.Umapathi, for R5

Table of Content
1. petitioner sought withdrawal due to settlement. (Para 1)
2. writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2)

ORDER

When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the dispute between the parties was duly settled before the Trial Court and he had also produced a copy of compromise memo before this Court. Hence, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition and in this regard, he had also made an endorsement in the case bundle.

2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No cost.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top