Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25105
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
B.Govindasamy S/o.Late.Bhagavathygounder – Appellant
Versus
The District Revenue Officer Tiruppur District – Respondent
Writ Petition | Article 226 | Na. Ka. 3840 / 2022 / A2
Important Points
A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition if a settlement is reached before the Trial Court.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Headnote
The matter concerned a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, requesting a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 2 to 4 to dispose of pending proceedings. The petitioner argued that the dispute was settled in the Trial Court and sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court observed and accepted the submission for withdrawal, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.M.Hareesh, for M/s.PV Law Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 to 4, Mr.N.Umapathi, for R5
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.M.Hareesh, for M/s.PV Law Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 to 4, Mr.N.Umapathi, for R5
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought withdrawal due to settlement. (Para 1) |
| 2. writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2) |
ORDER
When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the dispute between the parties was duly settled before the Trial Court and he had also produced a copy of compromise memo before this Court. Hence, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition and in this regard, he had also made an endorsement in the case bundle.
2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No cost.
