Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25110
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
P.Chinnadurai – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Villupuram – Respondent
Writ Petition | under Article 226
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.J.Muthukumaran
For the Respondents: Mrs.S.Anitha, SGP for R 1 To 5
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous based on mutual agreement of counsel.
Headnote:The writ petition was brought under Article 226 of the Constitution. It requested a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to evaluate a representation regarding the relocation of a burial ground for SC individuals. During hearings, counsel noted the request was rendered infructuous, leading to dismissal of the petition. The court determined to dismiss the petition based on this submission.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ seeking relocation consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel confirmed matter as infructuous. (Para 2) |
| 3. court dismissed the petition. (Para 3) |
PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation dated 25.08.2023 regarding relocation of burial ground for SC people of Melakalavai Village, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District, and pass orders thereon after holding an enquiry into the matter, on merits and in accordance with law, within a limited time frame For Petitioner(s) : Mr.J.Muthukumaran For Respondent(s): Mrs.S.Anitha, SGP for R 1 To 5
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to consider the representation dated 25.08.2023 regarding relocation of burial ground for SC people of Melakalavai Village, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District, and pass orders thereon after holding an enquiry into the matter, on merits and in accordance with law.
2. When this matter was taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel would submit that the prayer in this petition has become infructuous and hence, they request this Court to dismiss the present petition.
3. Therefore, by recording the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No cost.
