SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25155

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J
N.V.Murugan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Thoothukudi District – Respondent
Writ Petition under Article 226



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V.M.Jegadeesha Pandian
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

The court upheld the validity of a written undertaking by a temple committee as sufficient grounds to deny permission for the proposed event.

Headnote:This judgment addresses a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction to permit the 'Rekhla Race' and provide police protection for a temple festival. The court found that the temple committee had previously given a written undertaking against conducting the race which was considered sufficient, leading to the dismissal of the petition. The court determined that the petition lacked merit based on this prior agreement. As such, the court concluded with dismissal of the writ petition accordingly.

Table of Content
1. seeking permission for temple festival. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's consideration of written undertakings. (Para 3 , 4)
3. final decision on the dismissed petition. (Para 5)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to give permission for “Rekhla Race” function scheduled on 21.03.2026 and adequate protection for the kodai festival of Arulmigu Kalyani @ Kaniyamman Temple, Agaram, Thoothukudi District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.02.2026.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that the temple committee had already submitted an application seeking proper police protection and other necessary permissions for the conduct of the temple festival, and the same had been granted by way of a written permission, subject to certain conditions. It was further submitted that the temple committee had given a written undertaking agreeing to abide by the said conditions and had specifically stated that it would not conduct any rekhla race. The said undertaking was also placed before this Court for perusal and the same reads as follows:-

3. Heard the learned counsel on either sides and carefully perused the materials available on record.

4. Though the learning counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is unaware as to whether the person who had given the written undertaking really belongs to the temple committee, it is the considered opinion of this Court that the police could not have obtained any such statement from 3rd parties.

5. In view of the written undertaking given by the temple committee, I do not find any merit in this petition and this writ petition stands dismissed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top