Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Dhanamani – Appellant
Versus
S.Padmavathy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts establishing the basis for the cheque and subsequent legal actions. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the repayment and evidential burden. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence and affirmation of conviction based on legal standards. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
This Revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the Judgment passed by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dated 30.11.2021 in C.A.No.170 of 2018, wherein the Judgment passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate of the Fast Track Court ( Level-II) Coimbatore dated 05.04.2018 made in C.C.No.459 of
2017 was confirmed.
2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the case is as follows:
2.1.The petitioner herein is an accused in the complaint lodged by the respondent for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act alleging that the husband of the petitioner/Krishnan kutty borrowed a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- on 13.11.2009 from the respondent by executing a promissory note for the said sum and agreed to pay the said amount with 15% interest per annum . When the said money was demanded in order to discharge the legally
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
