SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 11019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice N.SENTHILKUMAR
CHANDRAMATHI – Appellant
Versus
S.SELLAPILLAI – Respondent



HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 8th day of March 2025 LOK ADALAT AWARD (Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

Presided over by The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and Members Mr.P.Rosiah, District Judge (Retd.)

Mr.E.V.Chandru @ E.Chandrasekaran, Advocate Crl.R.C.Nos.769 and 770 of 2024 Criminal Revision Case against the judgment made in Crl.A.Nos.39 and 40 of 2023 dated 05.04.2024 by the learned I Additional Distirct and Sessions Judge, Salem confirming the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistate IV, Salem in STC.Nos.3376 and 3377 of 2020 dated

02.02.2023.

Chandramathi ... Petitioner in Crl.R.C.769/2024 Selvam ... Petitioner in Crl.R.C.770/2024 Vs.

S.Sellapillai ... Respondent in both Crl.R.Cs This case came up for settlement before the National Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Mr.T.Dhasarathan, the learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr.Anbarasan, learned counsel for the respondent are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT Both the parties and their respective counsel are present.

2. The parties have settled the matter amicably. Their identities are verified based on their Aadhar Cards.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that as directed by this Court they have deposited a sum of Rs.75,000/- in respect of Crl.R.C.No.769 of 2024 and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in respect of Crl.R.C.No.770 of 2024 before the trial Court and they have no objection for the same to be withdrawn by the complainant.

4. As the parties have mutually agreed for the above settlement in full quit, the same is recorded and the trial Court is directed to disburse the above deposited amount to the complainant after due verification within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. The trial Court is directed to follow the usual mode of payment on proper identification of the party concerned in accordance with the terms of the award without insisting on any formal permission petition. The Criminal Revisions are closed accordingly. In view of the settlement between the parties the conviction order by the trial Court is set aside in terms of Section 320 Cr.P.C.

Chandramathi Selvam Counsel for the Petitioners S.Sellapillai Counsel for the respondent This National Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

Judge Member Member To The parties/Advocate concerned Copy to:

1. The I Additional Distirct and Sessions Judge, Salem

2. The Judicial Magistate IV, Salem

3.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

4.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

5.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

DSA Crl.R.C.Nos.769 and 770 of 2024

08.03.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top