Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Nirmal Kumar, J
Zahir B.Irani – Appellant
Versus
Babu Raj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts outlining the initiation of the criminal complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides concerning the loan and evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on the failures of both parties' claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final ruling and affirmation of the trial court's judgment. (Para 8 , 9) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 23.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 26.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.A.No.701 of 2015 Zahir B.Irani ... Appellant Vs.
Babu Raj ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the judgment of acquittal in C.C.No.4983 of 2010 dated 10.10.2015 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.IV, George Town, Chennai-600 001 and allow the above appeal.
For Appellant : Mr.B.Balanchander for Mr.Ashok Menon For Respondent : Dr.V.Suresh JUDGMENT The appellant as complainant filed a private complaint for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent in C.C.No.4983 of 2010 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.IV, George Town, Chennai (trial Court) and the same was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
