Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25231
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
T.Velusamy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Tiruppur District, Tiruppur – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Prakasam
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For R1 to R3, Mr.M.Loganathan for R4 and R5
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Prakasam
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For R1 to R3, Mr.M.Loganathan for R4 and R5
A petitioner can withdraw their petition, leading to its dismissal by the court.
Headnote:The petitioner sought a direction for measuring certain lands, but later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court noted the endorsement for withdrawal and concluded that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel undertakes to file vakalat for respondents. (Para 1) |
| 2. writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2) |
ORDER
Mr.M.Loganathan, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat on behalf of respondents 4 and 5.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
