SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25231

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
T.Velusamy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Tiruppur District, Tiruppur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Prakasam
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For R1 to R3, Mr.M.Loganathan for R4 and R5

Table of Content
1. counsel undertakes to file vakalat for respondents. (Para 1)
2. writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2)

ORDER

Mr.M.Loganathan, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat on behalf of respondents 4 and 5.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top