SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25366

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Prspctvs Productions Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited – Respondent
O.A.Nos.58 & 59 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Deepak for M/s.P.K.Law Firm
For the Respondents: -

Withdrawal of suit effectively concluded proceedings without costs.

Headnote:The judgment deals with a Plaint filed under the Civil Procedure Code, praying for a permanent injunction against infringing activities concerning a cinematographic film. The plaintiff, represented by counsel, requested withdrawal of the suit, which was duly noted by the court. The court dismissed the suit as withdrawn without costs, closing the associated applications, reflecting the court's findings on the plaintiff's request and the procedural aspects.

Table of Content
1. withdrawal of the suit by the plaintiff. (Para 1)
2. dismissal of the suit without costs. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the suit. He has made an endorsement for that purpose.

2. Therefore, this suit is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected original applications are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top