SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25398

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
K.M.Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar, Sathyamangalam, The Nilgiris District – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.B.Hari Krishnan
For the Respondents:Mr.P.Harish Govt.Advocate

The necessity of producing an original document for registration under the Registration Act was emphasized while allowing for alternative documentation.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India concerning the Registration Act. Facts of the Case: The petitioner challenged the refusal to register a settlement deed due to the lack of a required original document.

Findings of Court:
The court quashed the refusal check slip upon the petitioner’s readiness to obtain the non-traceable certificate.

Issues: The court addressed the necessity of producing an original document per Section 34-C of the Registration Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the procedural requirement for registration while directing compliance with regulations surrounding document verification.

Result: With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges refusal of document registration. (Para 1)
2. requirement for original document and alternative compliance procedures. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court quashes refusal and directs registration upon compliance. (Para 4)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE K.M.Ramaswamy ..Petitioner(s)

Vs The Sub Registrar, Sathyamangalam, The Nilgiris District.

..Respondent(s)

Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the respondent culminating in the refusal slip RFL/Sathyamangalam/4/2026 dated 11.02.2026 issued by the respondent herein, quash the same and consequently direct the Sub Registrar, sathyamangalam, the respondent herein to register the settlement deed dated 11.02.2026 executed by the petitioner settling the property comprised in Ka.Sa.544 Ne.Pu.He 1.22.0 (old Ka, Sa.98 Pu.A.3.01, situated in sathyamangalam taluk, thingalur B village, gopichettypalayam district, situated within the registration Sub-District of sathyamangalam, to and in favour of of his son R.Suresh Kumar in consideration of natural love and affection without insisting upon production of original of the parent document No.2657/2015, SRO, Satyamangalam, within a time limit that may be prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Hari Krishnan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Harish Govt.Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip issued by the respondent dated 11.02.2026 refusing to register the settlement deed dated 11.02.2026 presented by the petitioner for registration, on the ground that the petitioner has not produced the original parent document.

2. As per Section 34-C of the Registration Act, there is a necessity to produce the original document or non-traceable certificate.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner will take all efforts to obtain a non-traceable certificate to enable the petitioner to get the settlement deed dated 11.02.2026 registered by the registration department.

4. Since the petitioner is willing to produce the non-traceable certificate in respect of the parent document, the impugned refusal check slip dated 11.02.2026 issued by the respondent is hereby quashed, and the petitioner is directed to produce the non-traceable certificate to the respondent. On production of the same, the respondent shall register the settlement deed dated 11.02.2026, if it is otherwise in order, subject to payment of requisite stamp duty and registration fee. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top