SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25399

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J
Dr.Ambedkar Sirukadai Vyabarigal Pothunala Sangam – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Chairman /Street Vending Committee, Greater Chennai Corporation – Respondent



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.D.Bharathy
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Gopinathan SC

The court mandates timely consideration of representations for allotment of commercial spaces to street vendors.

Headnote:This case concerns a writ petition filed for the direction to respondents for allotting shops to street vendors in a newly constructed Commercial Complex at Broadway Bus Stand. The petitioner had filed representations which remained unconsidered, prompting this legal action. The court directed the second respondent to pass orders on the representations within 12 weeks, without prejudice to the merits of the case.

Table of Content
1. writ petition concerning allotment of shops. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's direction for timely consideration. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. final orders on representations to be issued. (Para 6)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to allot shops to the members of the petitioner Sangam in the Commercial Complex at Broadway Bus Stand.

2.According to the petitioner Sangam, their members are presently street vendors in the Broadway Bus Stand complex. The petitioner claims that a Commercial Complex is being constructed at the Broadway Bus Stand. The petitioner seeks for allotment of shops in the said complex at Broadway Bus Stand or anywhere nearby. The petitioner had given representations on 19.01.2024 and 05.02.2026 to the respondents for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.S.Gopinathan, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representations.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representations dated 19.01.2024 and 05.02.2026 seeking for allotment of shops to the members of the petitioner Sangam in the Commercial Complex at Broadway Bus Stand or anywhere nearby, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top