SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G. Arul Murugan, J
C.M. Sivababu – Appellant
Versus
Archaeological Survey of India – Respondent
W.P.No.11336 of 2026



Important Points

The withdrawal of a petition leads to automatic dismissal without any costs ordered.

Subject

Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction

Headnote

Statute Analysis: The petition concerns Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of Mandamus. Facts of the Case: The petitioner challenged the construction within temple premises based on a representation.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the withdrawal of the petition.

Issues: The court did not frame issues due to withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court’s reasoning revolves around the voluntary nature of withdrawal, leading to dismissal.

Result: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs. Karthikaa Ashok
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Rajesh Vivekanathan, Mr. NRR. Arun Natarajan

Table of Content
1. withdrawal of petition leads to dismissal. (Para 1)
2. court orders no costs following withdrawal. (Para 2)

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition.

2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top