Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs. Karthikaa Ashok
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Rajesh Vivekanathan, Mr. NRR. Arun Natarajan

The withdrawal of a petition leads to automatic dismissal without any costs ordered.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petition concerns Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of Mandamus. Facts of the Case: The petitioner challenged the construction within temple premises based on a representation.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the withdrawal of the petition.

Issues: The court did not frame issues due to withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court’s reasoning revolves around the voluntary nature of withdrawal, leading to dismissal.

Result: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. withdrawal of petition leads to dismissal. (Para 1)
2. court orders no costs following withdrawal. (Para 2)

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition.

2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :