SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25471

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J
Poojari Meyyan – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai – Respondent
W.P.Crl(MD)No.1775 of 2026 | W.M.P.Crl.(MD).No.435 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Saravanan
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (Crl. side), Mr.Prasanna Vinoth

Court permits festival participation without recognizing poojari rights, enforcing prior police permission.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing police authorities to provide protection for conducting the Panguni Uthiram festival and poojas at specified temple sannathis. Essential facts include prior permission granted by police to the third respondent for the festival on 28.03.2026, with the event already ongoing peacefully. The court found no discrimination in attendance but rejected claims to poojari rights due to an existing village poosari. The main issue framed was whether police protection was required and if the petitioner could participate without poojari rights. The court's ratio decidendi emphasized enforcement of existing permission, allowing petitioner's participation while clarifying no poojari rights, as the festival proceeded without hindrance per submissions. The writ petition was disposed of with directions permitting petitioner’s participation in the festival, barring any prevention by third respondent, and no poojari rights claimed.

Table of Content
1. prayer for police protection during temple festival. (Para 1)
2. festival ongoing per prior police permission. (Para 2 , 3)
3. no discrimination; rejects poojari claim. (Para 5)
4. permits participation, disposes writ. (Para 6)

ORDER

Seeking direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and the devotees for peacefully conducting the 'Panguni Uthiram' festival and poojas in connection with “Arulmigu Ariyanachchi Amman Sannthi and Arulmigu Malaiyandi Sannathi” situated at Puluthipatti Village, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District, on 01.04.2026, this writ petition is filed.

2.When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent submitted that already the temple festival has commenced and is peacefully going on in terms of the permission already granted by the second respondent police to the third respondent.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that on the application dated 25.03.2026 received from one Ayyakalai, permission was duly granted for conduct of the aforesaid temple festival, vide proceedings dated 28.03.2026. In this regard, he also placed before me the said proceedings for perusal.

4. Heard either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.

5.Though the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is being prevented from attending the Panguni Uttaram festival, the learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that there is no discrimination against anyone attending the festival. He further pointed out that the petitioner’s claim is not merely to attend the Panguni Uttaram festival, but also to act as a poojari of the said temple, which is unwarranted, as there is already an existing village poosari in the village.

6.In view of the above submission, and in terms of the permission which has already been granted vide proceedings dated 28.03.2026, since the temple festival has already commenced and is ongoing, the petitioner is permitted to participate in the Panguni Uttaram festival in the aforesaid temples. It is made clear that the third respondent or any other person shall not prevent the petitioner from participating in the festival. It is further made clear that the petitioner shall not claim any Poosari rights.

7.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top