Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, N.Sathish Kumar, J
Mohamed Yusuf – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Trichy Municipal Corporation, Trichy. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition dismissed; area declared non-vending zone. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. no survey followed; vendors relocated to alternatives. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. no right to original site; committee discretion upheld. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. appeal dismissed; liberty for representations. (Para 9 , 10) |
Challenging the order of the writ court dated 29.01.2026 passed in W.P(MD)No.1044 of 2026, whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed, the present Writ Appeal has been filed.
2.The Writ Petition was originally filed seeking a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from, in any manner, dispossessing or evicting the writ petitioners from their present place of street vending at N.S.B. Road, Trichy, till the completion of the survey as contemplated under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 2014”).
3.The learned Single Judge, taking into consideration the fact that a resolution had been passed by the Street Vending Committee declaring the area as a non-vending zone and that the writ petitioners had been put on notice of such resolution, dismiss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
