IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. SURENDER, JJ
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Sub-Regional Office Employees Provident Fund Organization – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Mahatma Gandhi Matriculation School – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to writ order dated 19.08.2025 (Para 1) |
| 2. writ petition rejected due to delay (Para 2) |
| 3. uncondonable delay leads to dismissal (Para 3) |
The writ order dated 19.08.2025 passed in W.P.No.17888 of 2023 is under challenge in the present intra-Court appeal.
2. The writ Court rejected the writ petition mainly on the ground of delay and latches. The findings of writ Court would show that the Appellate Authority has passed an order on 16.10.2014 and the writ petition came to be filed by the appellant on 07.06.2023. Except for the reason that the learned counsel for the appellant has not sent a copy of the order to the appellant, there is no other acceptable reason stated even in the writ affidavit filed by the appellant. Taking note of the said fact, the writ Court rejected the writ petition on the ground of delay and laches.
3. The delay of 9 years on the part of the Department is uncondonable. Such an uncondonable delay cannot be condoned by the Courts in a routine manner, though there is no time limit prescribed to entertain a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the event of entertaining such writ petitions beyond a reasonable per
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.