Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
Malathi Panneerselvam – Appellant
Versus
Rangarajan The Revenue Divisional Officer(South) – Respondent
Cont. P. No. 498 of 2026 | W.P. No. 30354 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent complied with court order, conceded by petitioner. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contempt petition closed due to compliance. (Para 3) |
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the order dated 12.08.2025 passed in W.P. No.30354 of 2025, which is the subject matter of this Contempt Petition has been duly complied with by the respondent. In support of his submission, he has produced a copy of the proceedings dated 23.03.2026 issued by the respondent.
2. The said submission has been fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Since the order passed by this Court has been duly complied with, the Contempt Petition is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
