Order

(1) Today, the matter is listed before this Court for deciding the maintainability of the Civil Revision Petition.

(2) The petitioner in the above Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is seeking clarification of the judgment of this Court in Muruganandham Vs. Joseph, wherein this Court held that RLTOP lies against a tenant although the tenancy agreement remains unregistered under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as ‘’TNRRRLT Act, 2017’’]. According to the petitioner, in the very same judgment, the flow chart shows that the remedy was only before the Civil court and not under the TNRRRLT Act, 2017. The petitioner stated that in view of the aforesaid contradiction, the Trial Courts in Chennai, were rendering contradictory judgments and hence, the above Civil Revision Petition.

(3) The Registry entertained a d