SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25654

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
M/s.Velavan Stores Silk Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
M/s.UCO Bank – Respondent
WMP NO. 12402 OF 2023 | O.A. No.649 / 2015



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Kamachi
For the Respondent(s): Ms.T.Hemalatha

Court enforces bank's assurance to retrieve and return original sale deed from DRT to property purchaser.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the respondent bank to retrieve and hand over the original sale deed dated 31.03.2004 (Document No.950/2004) filed in O.A. No.649/2015 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai. The properties were previously mortgaged by a defaulting borrower, sold via Official Liquidator, and purchased by the petitioner with the bank's assurance to retrieve the document. The court found the bank's undertaking valid and directed compliance. The key issue was enforcement of the bank's written assurance to retrieve the sale deed from DRT-II within 30 days post-sale. The court noted the bank's application already filed, estimating eight weeks, and emphasized expeditious action per its supervisory jurisdiction. The writ petition was disposed of with directions to the bank to retrieve and return documents within 12 weeks, and DRT-II to process any application within 4 weeks. No costs.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for sale deed retrieval from drt. (Para 1 , 2)
2. bank filed application, seeks eight weeks. (Para 3)
3. court directs retrieval within timelines, petition disposed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 12402 OF 2023 M/s.Velavan Stores Silk Private Limited., Registered office at 52, Gin Factory Road, Thoothukudi 628 002.

Rep by its Director T.Maharajan, S/o.A.Thangavel, No.161- H, Ettaiyapuram Road, Thoothukudi - 628 002.

Petitioner(s)

Vs M/s.UCO Bank Rep by its Chief Manager, MID Corporate Branch, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

Respondent(s)

PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to take appropriate steps for collecting the original Sale Deed dated 31.03.2004, Document No.950 / 2004, registered in the office of Sub- Registrar T.Nagar which was filed along with the O.A. No.649 / 2015 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal -II, Chennai and to handover the same to the petitioner within a time that may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Kamachi For Respondent(s): Ms.T.Hemalatha,

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondent herein to take appropriate steps for collecting the original Sale Deed dated 31.03.2004, Document No.950 / 2004, registered in the office of Sub- Registrar T.Nagar which was filed along with the O.A. No.649 / 2015 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal -II, Chennai and to handover the same to the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the properties situated at Door No.79, Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017 and Door No.19/3 & Door No.49, Sarojini Street, T-Nagar, Chennai – 600 017 was mortgaged by M/s.Ratna Stores Pvt Ltd., to the respondent Bank. Since the said M/s.Ratna Stores Pvt Ltd., committed default in repayment of loan, the aforesaid properties were brought for sale by the Official Liquidator. The petitioner purchased the aforesaid properties through a sale deed dated 05.09.2019 from the Official Liquidator. Before the purchase of the said properties it was informed to the petitioner that the original sale deed of the aforesaid properties were filed as a document in O.S.No.649 of 2015 and the respondent assured the petitioner in writing that the respondent Bank will get back the original sale deed of the aforesaid properties from DRT-II, Chennai, by filing necessary application, within a period of 30 days from the date of execution of the sale deed. However, till date the same has not been handed over to the petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition.

3.Learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the respondent has already filed a necessary application to get back the original sale deed of the subject properties before the DRT-II, Chennai and it may take another eight weeks to get the documents. He would further submit that once the documents are received by them from the DRT-II, Chennai the same will be handed over to the petitioner.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

5.In view of the above, recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, the respondent is directed to take speedy steps to get back the documents filed in O.S.No.649 of 2015 and return the same to the petitioner, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.As there is no dispute with the petitioner’s entitlement to get back their documents pertaining to the subject properties, if any application is made for the purpose of getting back the said documents, the DRT-II, Chennai is directed to consider the same and pass order to return the aforesaid documents, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top