Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25661
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Dr.Vinod Balasundaram – Appellant
Versus
The State Highways Department – Respondent
WMP NO. 33363 OF 2022
Important Points
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition challenging land acquisition, dismissing it without costs.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Act Referred
Constitution of India: S.226
Headnote
First Paragraph: The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking certiorarified mandamus to quash land acquisition proceedings for Ukkadam-Athupalam flyover expansion and direct provision of land dimensions and compensation details. The court noted the petitioners' request for withdrawal. No findings on merits were made. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was the petitioners' application to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the submissions and memo without substantive reasoning on land acquisition. Last Paragraph: Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Narmada Sampath
For the Respondents: Mrs.S.Indhu Bala Additional Government Pleader
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Narmada Sampath
For the Respondents: Mrs.S.Indhu Bala Additional Government Pleader
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition withdrawn and dismissed. (Para 1 , 2) |
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also filed a memo to that effect.
2.Recording the submissions and the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
