SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25661

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Dr.Vinod Balasundaram – Appellant
Versus
The State Highways Department – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Narmada Sampath
For the Respondents: Mrs.S.Indhu Bala Additional Government Pleader

Table of Content
1. petition withdrawn and dismissed. (Para 1 , 2)

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also filed a memo to that effect.

2.Recording the submissions and the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top