Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
M/s. Blow Plast Industries – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners allege violation of procurement policies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. respondents' defense relies on jurisdiction and contract interpretation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. counterarguments emphasize non-violation of policy. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. court scrutinizes legality and implications of procurement policy. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 5. judicial review may prevent circumvention of law. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 6. malafide intent suggested in tender process. (Para 53) |
| 7. court's directive to follow statutory procurement policy. (Para 54) |
COMMON ORDER
Alleging that the respondent corporation is attempting to circumvent the procurement policy notified by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 11 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 , hereinafter called the MSMED Act, the petitioners are before this Court.
2. It would be necessary to allude to the petitioners’ case as well as the defense to decide the issue on hand.
Petitio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
