Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J
Sethumahaali – Appellant
Versus
Palanivel – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suit progress and applications to recall pw1 dismissed by trial court. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. counsel arguments on urgency vs. delay tactics. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. title tracing critical; cross-exam failure accepts testimony. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conditional recall granted with costs and timelines for justice. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
COMMON ORDER
These Civil Revision Petitions challenge the order dated
06.12.2025 passed in I.A.Nos.5 and 6 of 2025 in O.S.No.15 of 2022 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Mudukulathur.
2.These two Civil Revision Petitions are at the instance of the third defendant. The parties shall be referred to as their ranks in the suit.
3.The plaintiffs presented O.S.No.15 of 2022 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge at Mudukulathur, seeking the relief of declaration of title and for a consequential relief of permanent injunction. Summons were served on the defendants. The defendants have filed a detailed written statement. Thereafter, the Court commenced the trial. The first plaintiff entered the witness box as PW1. Ex.A1 to Ex.A11 were marked.
4.On the basis of the oral and documentary evidences tendered, the learned counsel for the defendants
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
