IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. Jayachandran, Shamim Ahmed, JJ
Tvl.Shriram Finance Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Joint Commissioner (CT), Chennai (East) Division, Chennai – Respondent
(Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.Jayachandran J.)
The issue that involves in this case, had already been settled in favour of the Revenue for the same assessee for the other assessment years. Therefore, there is no substantial question of law required to be answered in this tax case, in view of the judgment of this Court rendered in T.C.(Revision).No.6 of 2026, dated 05.03.2026 between the same assessee and the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Chennai (East), wherein, in paragraph 2, it was observed as under: “2. In view of the judgments rendered by this Court in respect of the substantial question of law involved in this matter and in respect of the same parties, but for the different Assessment Years, in Tax Case (Revision) No.101 of 2025, dated 16.10.2025, Tax Case (Revision) No.92 of 2025, dated 23.09.2025 and T.C.Nos.113 and 114 of 2025, dated 10.12.2025, we are of the view that this Tax Case (Revision) has to be dismissed by following the said three judgments of the Division Benches of this Court. Accordingly, the substantial questions of law framed in this case are answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue and th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.