SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25773

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
M.Jayaramachandar – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of corporation Coimbatore Corporation – Respondent
W.P. No. 11768 of 2026 | W.M.P.No.12844 of 2026



Advocates:
For Petitioner(s): Mr. D.Veerasekaran
For Respondent(s): Mr. Najeeb Usman Khan Standing Counsel

Authority must consider timely representations under Section 128 before final orders and eviction.

Headnote:The notice issued under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, challenged via writ petition. Petitioner submitted explanation within time, but authority sought eviction pre-final decision. Court held procedures under Section 128 must be followed scrupulously. Issue framed: whether authority can evict before considering representation. Ratio: statute mandates consideration of timely representations before final orders and enforcement action. Writ petition disposed directing consideration of representation, final orders, then enforcement if encroachment found.

Table of Content
1. notice under section 128 challenged; representation submitted timely. (Para 1 , 2)
2. authority must consider representation before final orders. (Para 3)
3. direct consideration, then enforcement if encroached. (Para 4)

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)

The notice issued under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, is under challenge in the present Writ Petition.

2. Admittedly, the petitioner has submitted his explanation on

13.02.2026. The grievance of the petitioner is that, before taking a final decision, the authority is attempting to evict the petitioner. It is needless to state that the procedures contemplated under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, must be scrupulously followed by the authority. The statute mandates that any representation received within the prescribed time limit shall be considered by the authority or the officer concerned before passing final orders. Thus, the competent authority has to pass the final orders before initiating any enforcement action for the removal of encroachments.

3. In the present case, the petitioner has already submitted his representation. Thus, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass final orders, and thereafter proceed with enforcement action, if any encroachment is identified.

4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top