Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No Appearance
For the Respondents: Mr.R.A.Senapathi

Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to appellant's failure to appear.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Appeal filed under Section 47 of Guardian & Wards Act 1890 challenging order dated 29.02.2024 in G.W.O.P.No.14 of 2022 by Principal District Judge, Vellore. Essential facts involve appellant's failure to appear on prior hearing date, leading to posting for dismissal. Court finds no representation, resulting in dismissal for non-prosecution. Second Paragraph: No specific issues framed due to procedural default. Ratio decidendi centers on dismissal for non-prosecution where appellant fails to appear despite prior notice. Last Paragraph: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Table of Content
1. matter posted for dismissal due to no appellant representation. (Para 1)
2. appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; petitions closed. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up on 17.03.2026, as none represented the appellant, the matter stands posted today under the caption for dismissal.

2. Today also none represents the appellant. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.