Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
A.Thangavel – Appellant
Versus
K.A.Venkatesan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging trial court's dismissal of plaint amendment on limitation grounds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. suit for revenue record correction; delayed amendment application. (Para 3) |
| 3. limitation starts from title-disputing written statement; amendment barred after 14 years. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. no interference; revision petition dismissed. (Para 6) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition had been filed challenging an order by which an application to amend the plaint had been dismissed by the trial Court as being barred by the law of limitation.
2. Heard Mr.B.Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.V.Anandhamoorthy, learned counsel for the respondents 13 and 14 and perused the materials available on record.
3.The petitioners have initially filed a suit to remove the entries made during resurvey of the properties from the Revenue records. An application had been filed in a suit filed in the year 2006, to rectify certain survey numbers and extent in the suit schedule properties and a prayer for declaration that the suit properties belong to the plaintiffs have been made with consequential amendments to the valuation of the suit and the court fees in that regard.
4.A reading of the a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
