SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 25872

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
S.Venkadasalapathy – Appellant
Versus
U.Kasiraj – Respondent
W.A(MD)No.413 of 2026|C.M.P(MD)No.3784 of 2026|W.P(MD)No.8882 of 2024



Advocates:
For Appellants: Mr.S.Kadarkarai
For Respondents: Mr.S.Malaikani (R1), Mr.S.P.Maharajan (R2, R4 & R5), Mr.K.Sanjay Gandhi (R3 & R6)

Writ jurisdiction unavailable to resolve temple festival disputes between private groups; civil proceedings required.

Headnote:The writ petition sought constitution of a committee from Revenue, Police, and HR & CE Departments to regulate poojas, maintenance, and festivals at a temple amid disputes between village groups. The Single Judge disposed of the petition by directing groups to form a committee for peaceful conduct of festivals with police protection. The Division Bench found no merit as parties must establish rights through civil proceedings rather than writ jurisdiction. The core issue was whether writ court could direct committee formation for temple festival amid group disputes. The court held that writ jurisdiction is unavailable for establishing private rights; parties must resort to civil suits. Admitted dispute requires legal determination outside extraordinary jurisdiction. The Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

Table of Content
1. dispute over temple festival; single judge permits committee. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. writ not for private rights; pursue civil remedy. (Para 5 , 6)

[Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

Challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(MD)No.8882 of 2024, dated 17.02.2026, whereby the writ petition was disposed of by granting liberty to all groups to form a committee and conduct the festival, respondents 6 and 7, as appellants, have preferred the present Writ Appeal.

2.The writ petition was filed seeking constitution of a committee comprising members from the Revenue Department, Police Department, and HR & CE Department, to regulate and ensure the peaceful conduct of time-bound poojas, maintenance, and festivals of Arulmigu Sri Kaliyamman Temple.

3.There exists a dispute between two groups in the village with regard to the conduct of the festival.

4.The learned Single Judge, taking into consideration the above circumstances, disposed of the writ petition by observing that all groups may come together to form a committee and conduct the festival peacefully, and granted liberty to that effect. Police protection was also directed to be provided. Challenging the said order, respondents 6 and 7 have filed the present Writ Appeal.

5.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6.It is an admitted fact that there exists a dispute between the parties with regard to the conduct of poojas and festival. If both groups are not willing to jointly form a committee and conduct the festival peacefully, it is open to them to establish their respective rights by filing appropriate civil proceedings in the manner known to law. As a matter of right, they cannot seek such relief in a writ petition. Therefore, we do not find any merit in the present Writ Appeal. Insofar as maintenance of law and order is concerned, it is open to the police authorities to take necessary action in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top