IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
NP.Karunakaran – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Medical Council – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prior consideration renders petition infructuous. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal due to infructuous nature. (Para 2) |
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's complaint dated 27.09.2022 has already been considered and an order was passed on 19.02.2024. Challenging the said order, the petitioner has filed writ petition in W.P.No.29643 of 2023.
Hence, this writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.