Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
S.Sivaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Tirukovilur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. de facto complainant seeks final report direction after fir delay. (Para 1) |
| 2. prosecutor confirms charge sheet already filed. (Para 2) |
ORDER
The petitioner as the defacto complainant has lodged a complaint against one Ramachandiran and Manojkumar on the file of the respondent police in Crime No.66 of 2025 registered on 17.06.2025 for the offences under Section
13(c) and 15(2) of Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. It is nine months since then, however, no action has been taken. The petitioner was not called for further recording of statement or clarification. Hence, he has filed the present petition for a direction to the respondent to file the final report as regards the case in Crime no.66 of 2025.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that in this case a charge sheet/final report has already been filed before the Principal District Court, Kallakurichi and has also filed the online uploading details with regard to the same.
3.Recording the same, the petition is disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
