Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
M.Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore North Circle, Thudiyalur, Coimbatore – 641 017. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to remand order in patta dispute. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners seek time-bound disposal direction. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. mandate expeditious final orders with hearings. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order, dated 27.09.2023 passed by the 1st respondent, remanding the matter back to the 2nd respondent for fresh consideration.
2. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 9 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 4 to 9 is dispensed with by this Court.
3. Even though a specific ground has been raised by the petitioner that the 1st respondent by total non-application of mind to the fact that he does not have power to remand the matter to the 2nd respondent for fresh consideration has passed the impugned order, the learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, would submit that the petitioners will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the matter pursuant to the impugned order dated 27.09.2023 passed by the 1st respondent, within a time frame to be fi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
