Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
V.Sathish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Krishnagiri District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks fair compensation post-representation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. acquisition completed; enhancement sought. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. prayer denied; liberty for enhancement granted. (Para 5 , 6) |
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to provide Fair Compensation for the lands of the petitioner’s property admeasuring an extent of 0.83 Acres at Survey No. 152/4A, situated at Attakurikki Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District based on the petitioner’s representation dated 31.01.2023 under the Right to Fair Compensation(Rehabilitation and Resettlement)Act, 2013.
For Petitioner(s): Ms.R.Saritha For Respondent(s): Mr.Vadivelu Deendayalan Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to provide Fair Compensation for the lands of the petitioner’s property admeasuring an extent of 0.83 Acres at Survey No. 152/4A, situated at Attakurikki Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District based on the petitioner’s representation dated 31.01.2023 under the Right to Fair Compensation(Rehabilita
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
