Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
M.A.Ganapathy – Appellant
Versus
The Greater Chennai Corporation – Respondent
Writ Petition
Important Points
Writ petition closed upon parties' settlement, no costs imposed.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Act Referred
Constitution of India: S.226
Headnote
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing disbursement of group insurance amount of Rs.3,00,000/-. The court noted the settlement between parties. The writ petition was closed without costs. The sole issue was compliance with the settlement terms. The court recorded the counsel's submission confirming amicable resolution. Writ petition stands closed. No costs.
Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): M/s.N.Beulah John Selvaraj
For the Respondent(s): Ms.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel R1 To R3, Mr.J.T.Raja Suriya For R4
For the Petitioner(s): M/s.N.Beulah John Selvaraj
For the Respondent(s): Ms.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel R1 To R3, Mr.J.T.Raja Suriya For R4
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel submits amicable settlement reached. (Para 1) |
| 2. petition closed upon settlement confirmation. (Para 2) |
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter has been settled between the parties.
2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands closed. No costs.
