SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
M.A.Ganapathy – Appellant
Versus
The Greater Chennai Corporation – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): M/s.N.Beulah John Selvaraj
For the Respondent(s): Ms.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel R1 To R3, Mr.J.T.Raja Suriya For R4

Writ petition closed upon parties' settlement, no costs imposed.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing disbursement of group insurance amount of Rs.3,00,000/-. The court noted the settlement between parties. The writ petition was closed without costs. The sole issue was compliance with the settlement terms. The court recorded the counsel's submission confirming amicable resolution. Writ petition stands closed. No costs.

Table of Content
1. counsel submits amicable settlement reached. (Para 1)
2. petition closed upon settlement confirmation. (Para 2)

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter has been settled between the parties.

2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top