Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26059
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, K. K. Ramakrishnan, JJ
Vidhya Devi Manoharan – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai Zonal Office-II – Respondent
W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1560 of 2026 | W.M.P.(MD).Nos.384 ad 385 of 2026
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Vasantha Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.S.G.L.Riswanth, Standing Counsel, A.Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Vasantha Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.S.G.L.Riswanth, Standing Counsel, A.Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor
Court permits withdrawal of writ petition without merits adjudication.
Headnote:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash communication from Directorate of Enforcement regarding provisional attachment of property and direct Sub-Registrar to register documents. Court noted request for withdrawal by petitioner's counsel with endorsement. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, miscellaneous petitions closed. Issue framed as challenge to enforcement communication impacting property registration. Ratio: Court permitted withdrawal without adjudication on merits. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition withdrawn and dismissed. (Para 1 , 2) |
[Order of the Court was made by N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.]
When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the above, this writ petition (criminal) stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
