Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
K.Thilagar – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General of Registration – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. family property dispute via forged settlements and registration refusal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. parties argue powers under registration act post section 77-a. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. no fraud cancellation power; title to civil court. (Para 13 , 14) |
For Petitioner : Ms.P.Yasmin Begum For Respondents : Mr.M.Gangatharan Government Advocate COMMON ORDER These two writ petitions are connected and are disposed of by this common order.
2. W.P.(MD)No.16241 of 2024 has been filed by K.Thilagar. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material records, the grievance of the petitioner is that the property originally belonged to his father, who executed a registered Will dividing the property into A, B, C, and D Schedules and bequeathing shares to himself as well as to his brother’s son. The Will also contains a clause restraining alienation of the property.
3. While so, it is alleged that the other branch of the family is attempting to deal with the property. A settlement deed bearing Document No. 5706 of 2022 has been registered, and based on the same, another settlement deed bearing Document No.2129 of 2024 has also been fraudulently registe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
