Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26099
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, R.Poornima, JJ
K.S.A.Pandian – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, City Municipal Corporation, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.22933 of 2021 | W.M.P.(MD)Nos.19411 and 19413 of 2021
Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed
For Respondent: Mr.N.Anadakumar Standing Counsel
For Petitioner: Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed
For Respondent: Mr.N.Anadakumar Standing Counsel
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's submission that no issues remain.
Headnote:The petitioner challenged a demolition notice issued under municipal authority pertaining to property in Survey No.53/1 at Krishnarajapuram, Thoothukudi, via writ petition under Article 226. The court noted no specific statutory sections were argued. Essential facts involved impugned notice Na.ka.No.F1/3185/2021Va.Ma dated 13-12-2021. The court found the matter infructuous as submitted by counsel. No formal issues were framed. The court's reasoning rested solely on counsel's submission that nothing survived for adjudication. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel submits matter infructuous. (Para 1) |
| 2. petition dismissed as infructuous. (Para 2) |
(Order of the Court was delivered by G.R.Swaminathan, J.)
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter became infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
