SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26099

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, R.Poornima, JJ
K.S.A.Pandian – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, City Municipal Corporation, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed
For Respondent: Mr.N.Anadakumar Standing Counsel

Table of Content
1. counsel submits matter infructuous. (Para 1)
2. petition dismissed as infructuous. (Para 2)

(Order of the Court was delivered by G.R.Swaminathan, J.)

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter became infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.

2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top