Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, R.Poornima, JJ
R.Gomathi – Appellant
Versus
The State represented by The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner obstructed public pathway; prior orders upheld eviction. (Para 2) |
| 2. parties contest interference with eviction orders. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. pathway public per records and deeds; obstruction prohibited. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)
Heard both sides.
2.The writ petitioner herein challenges the order passed by the Revenue and Disaster Management Department dated 24.09.2019 whereby her revision petition was dismissed. The case on hand pertains to Survey No.388/13A in Pattinamkathan Village in Ramanathapuram Taluk. The petitioner had obstructed a pathway by putting up a compound wall and a iron gate. The private respondent herein, namely, Rajeshwari, filed a complaint before the jurisdictional Tahsildar seeking removal of the said encroachment committed by the petitioner herein. The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram vide order dated 30.01.2018 passed under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 called upon the petitioner to remove the same. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioner herein filed an appeal before the District collector, Ramanathapuram, who vide order dated 30.06.2018 dismissed the appeal. Challenging the same, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
