Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
S.A.Mohammed Naufal – Appellant
Versus
Tamilnadu Waqf Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges waqf election and disqualifications. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. board and respondents urge tribunal jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. writ court lacks jurisdiction over factual disputes. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. directs tribunal approach and specific enquiry. (Para 8) |
ORDER
By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2.This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent dated 05.03.2026 and consequently, to declare the candidatures (respondents 3 to 5) as null and void and further, direct the eligible members to take part in the administration of Uthuman Lebbai Sahib Masjid Jamath(Mosque), Managing Committee.
3.Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the case of the petitioner is that when the election with reference to the aforementioned waqf was conducted, in spite of resolutions by the Jamath members, the respondents 3 to 5 were declared to be elected and their election is also accepted by the Waqf Board. The contention of the petitioner is that with reference to the third respondent, the majority members have passed the resolution as finding him not suitable for the Office
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
