Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Tamanna – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General Of Registration – Respondent
Writ Petition

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.J.Thamizharasan, for M/s.Eswar, Kumar and Rao
For the Respondents: Ms.K.Aswini Devi, AGP

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon parties' joint submission that prayer is moot.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct release of a registered sale deed (Document No. 773 of 2024). Essential facts involved a representation dated 16.08.2024 to respondents for release. Court found the prayer infructuous based on parties' submissions. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was whether mandamus should issue for deed release. Ratio decidendi: Parties agreed the relief sought is no longer necessary, rendering petition infructuous. Last Paragraph: Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for sale deed release. (Para 1)
2. parties submit prayer is infructuous. (Para 2)
3. petition dismissed as infructuous. (Para 3)

PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to release the sale deed registered as Document No. 773 of 2024 on 29.02.2024 on the file of the 3rd Respondent vide representation dated 16.08.2024 within the time period stipulated by this Honble court For Petitioner: Mr.J.Thamizharasan, for M/s.Eswar, Kumar and Rao For Respondent(s): Ms.K.Aswini Devi, AGP

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to release the sale deed registered as Document No. 773 of 2024 on 29.02.2024 on the file of the 3^rd respondent vide representation dated 16.08.2024.

2. When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents would submit that the prayer in this petition has become infructuous. Hence, they request to dismiss the present petition.

3. Therefore, by recording the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No cost.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASKRISHNAN RAMASAMY, JTamanna – AppellantVersusThe Inspector General Of Registration – RespondentWrit Petition

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon parties' joint submission that prayer is moot.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Tamanna – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General Of Registration – Respondent
Writ Petition