Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
S.Satish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
K.Solairaj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant challenges trial court order allowing cross-examination. (Para 2) |
| 2. parties argue relevance of tripartite agreement and suppression. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court notes tenant's unclean hands and inconsistent heirship claims. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order dated 18.02.2026 passed in M.P No.2 of
2026 in RLTOP No.2 of 2025 on the file of the District Munsif, Ponneri, the tenant has preferred this revision.
2. The tenant has filed an application before the trial court to cross-
examine the applicant in RLTOP No.2 of 2025 and the same was allowed by the learned trial judge by granting permission to the tenant to cross examine the landlord. Aggrieved over the same, the present revision is filed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under the new Act viz, Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017, the tenant is not entitled to seek permission for cross examining the landlord, unless the court permits. It is only the decision of the court that he come forward with new ground. The applicant raised allegations against the landlord for that he want to cross examine, more particularly with regard to th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
