Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
Sundhari – Appellant
Versus
S.R.Ponnumani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of suit and late impleadment of lis pendens purchaser. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. trial court allows cross-examination for natural justice. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. limits of article 227 revision; power under order xviii rule 17. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. confirms order with costs and strict timelines. (Para 13) |
COMMON O R D E R
These two Civil Revision Petitions challenge the order and decree passed by the learned District Munsif, Mudukulathur, in I.A. No. 8 of 2025 and I.A.No.9 of 2025 in O.S. No. 24 of 2016, dated 03.12.2025.
2. The plaintiff is the Civil Revision Petitioner. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as per their ranks in the suit.
3. O.S.No.24 of 2016 is a suit for declaration of title, permanent injunction and a further declaration that the settlement deed dated 12.02.2013 in Document No.173 of 2013 is null and void and for costs. Pending the suit, the 2nddefendant purchased a portion of the property and was impleaded as a party in I.A.No.219 of 2019, dated 16.12.2019. The 2nddefendant has also filed his written statement.
4. On the basis of the pleadings, issues were framed and the suit was taken up for trial. By the time
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
