SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26275

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
S.J.Mohankumar – Appellant
Versus
The District Magistrate cum the District collector Thiruvaruru – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Sathish Kumar, for Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar
For the Respondents: Mrs.S.Anitha, SGP for R1, Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, for R2 to 5, Mr.R.Sankarasubbu for R6

Mandamus directs enquiry outcome on objection to electricity infrastructure on private land.

Headnote:Under Section 12(2) of the Electricity Act 1910 read with Rule 3(1)(a) and (b) of Works of Licensees Rules 2006 and Section 16(1) of the Telegraphs Act 1885, petitioner objected to installation of electric poles and service lines on private land (S. No. 183/1N). Court found enquiry conducted on representation dated 23.06.2021 but outcome unclear. Directions issued for passing orders or supplying copies thereof. Issues framed around adequacy of enquiry response and procedural compliance. Ratio emphasizes timely disposal of objections post-enquiry with liberty to challenge. Writ petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for enquiry on land objection. (Para 1)
2. enquiry conducted; order status unclear. (Para 2)

PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to conduct enquiry based on the objection petitioner dated 23.06.2021 submitted by the petitioner under Sec. 12(2) of the Electricity Act 1910 Read with Rule 3 (1) (a) and (b) of Works of Licensees Rules 2006 and section 16 (1) of Telegraphs Act 1885 and consequently direct the respondents 2-5 to drop the proposal of planting the electric poles and drawing service ines in the petitioner land in S. No. 183 / 1N situated at Marangudi ilage Koothanallur Taluk, Thriuvarur District within a time frame fixed by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Sathish Kumar, for Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar For Respondent(s): Mrs.S.Anitha, SGP for R1 Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, for R2 to 5 Mr.R.Sankarasubbu for R6

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent herein to conduct enquiry based on the petitioner’s objection dated 23.06.2021.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent would submit that the enquiry was conducted based on the petitioner's representation. However, both are not in a position to ascertain as to whether the orders were passed or not.

3. In view of the above, this Court passes the following order: i) If no order is passed after enquiry, this Court directs the respondents to pass order, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

ii) If the order was already passed, this Court directs the respondents to issue a copy of the order to the petitioner within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

iii) The petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the order, either passed or to be passed, by the respondents.

4. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top