Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Nirmal Kumar, J
Velusamy – Appellant
Versus
The State represented by Inspector of Police, Kangeyam Police Station, Tiruppur District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek quashing of fir for protest offences. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no material for offences; protest is fundamental right. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. prosecution claims unlawful assembly without permission. (Para 6) |
| 4. slogans protected; no evidence or witnesses for charges. (Para 7) |
| 5. fir and charge sheet quashed. (Para 8) |
For Petitioners : Mr.N.S.Suganthan For R1 : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The petitioners, who are accused in FIR in Crime No.399 of 2025 for offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2) & 291 BNS on the file of the 1st respondent Police, have filed the Quash Petition.
2.Case of the prosecution is that the 2nd respondent, Tahsildar, Kangeyam Taluk Office lodged a complaint on 24.06.2025 stating that the petitioners herein along with 400 persons under the leadership and instructions of the 1st petitioner assembled together in front of the Office of Kangeyam-Vellakovil Water Conservation Association, Bhagavathipalayam on Tiruchirapalli-Coimbatore National Highways opposite to Divya Mahal and put up a steel sheet held in the private land belonging to the Association for the purpose of holding demonstration in the for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
