Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
P.Jeeva – Appellant
Versus
V. Haridoss – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. third party impleadment application dismissed due to sale deed cancellation. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's bona fide claim versus plaintiffs' fabrication objection. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. civil court to decide bona fide status post-trial; implead necessary. (Para 6) |
| 4. revision allowed, order set aside. (Para 7) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order dated 18.08.2025 passed in I.A.No.3 of
2023 in O.S.No.6000 of 2014 on the file of the VII Asst. Judge City Civil, Court, Chennai, the revision has been preferred by a third party.
2. Before the Trial Court, the revision petitioner, as third party, filed an application to implead him as seventh defendant in the suit, as he is a purchaser of the portion of the suit property. The said application was dismissed by the Trial judge by holding that already the purchase made by the petitioner was cancelled by the District Registrar after due enquiry on 06.08.2025. Therefore, as on date he has no right to claim ownership over the property based on the alleged sale deed. Therefore, he is not a necessary party to the proceedings, accordingly, the said petition was dismissed. Aggrieved over the same, the present revision petition is filed.
3. Heard
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
