Periyanayaki vs Saradhamani - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26379

Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26379

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
Periyanayaki – Appellant
Versus
Saradhamani – Respondent
CMP.No.17403 of 2022

Important Points

Civil revision dismissed as infructuous due to disposal of underlying suit.

Subject

Civil - Revision Petition

Act Referred

Constitution of India: Article 227

Headnote

The petitioner challenged an interlocutory order under Article 227 of the Constitution in a pending suit. The suit O.S.No.398 of 2015 was disposed of by judgment dated 12.10.2023. The court found the revision infructuous due to the suit's disposal. Issue: Whether the Civil Revision Petition requires adjudication post-suit disposal. Ratio: Matter dismissed as infructuous since underlying suit concluded. Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs ordered.

Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Ponraj
For the Respondent(s): Mr.N.Srinivasan for R1

Table of Content
1. challenges interlocutory order in pending suit. (Para 1)
2. dismissed as infructuous post-suit disposal. (Para 2 , 3)

ORDER

The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 27-06-2022 made in I.A.No.848 of 2021 in O.S.No.398 of 2015 on the file of Hon’ble Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram.

2. When the matter was taken up today, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the suit in O.S.No.398 of 2015 in which the present CRP arises had been disposed of by a judgment and decree dated 12.10.2023.

3. In view of the said fact, the present Civil Revision Petition requires no further adjudication and hence, dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.