SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26395

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Saraswathi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Office of The District Collector Office, Coimbatore District. – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Rajaram
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader [R1 to R3]

Mandamus directs authorities to consider representation and rectify erroneous patta transfer after hearing parties.

Headnote:Filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus to consider representation dated 21.02.2026 and restore patta No.1754 in petitioner's name. Petitioner claims official respondents erroneously included private respondents' names in patta without hearing, depriving petitioner's ownership rights. Court finds no prejudice in directing consideration of representation on merits. Issue framed as erroneous inclusion of private parties in petitioner's patta without notice. Ratio: Authorities must rectify administrative mistakes after hearing all parties and considering documents, without expressing opinion on merits. 3rd respondent directed to pass final orders on representation within 12 weeks after hearing objections; writ petition disposed of without costs.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks patta rectification for erroneous inclusion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. no prejudice in considering representation after hearing. (Para 4)
3. direct final orders within 12 weeks; petition disposed. (Para 5)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to rectify the mistake committed in Patta No.1745 which was earlier standing in the name of the petitioner in respect of the property morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition.

2. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order is passed against the respondents 4 to 10 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 4 to 10 is dispensed with by this Court.

3. According to the petitioner, erroneously, without hearing the petitioner, the official respondents have included the names of the private respondents, namely the respondents 4 to 10 in the patta for the property owned by the petitioner. In such circumstances, the petitioner had given a representation on 21.02.2026 to the official respondents requesting them to correct the mistake and restore the original patta bearing No.1745 in favour of the petitioner. Since the said representation was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections, if any, from the respondents 4 to 10 and any other party, whom the 3rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation, dated 21.02.2026 seeking removal of the names of the respondents 4 to 10 in the patta for the property morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition and for restoration of patta bearing No.1745 which is earlier standing in the name of the petitioner alone, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, and after hearing the objections, if any, from the respondents 4 to 10 and any other party, whom the 3rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top