R.Amrithkrishna vs The Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
R.Amrithkrishna – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department – Respondent

Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.D.S.Rajasekaran
For Respondents:Mr.A.Edwin Prabhakar, State Government Pleader for the first respondent, Ms.P.Veena Suresh, Standing counsel, for the second respondent, Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, Standing Counsel, for respondents 3 and 4

Table of Content
1. petition withdrawn and dismissed without costs. (Para 1 , 2)

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition.

2. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASSushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, JR.Amrithkrishna – AppellantVersusThe Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
R.Amrithkrishna – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department – Respondent