IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, M.Jothiraman, JJ
M.Janet Amala Arul Jothi – Appellant
Versus
Samuel Raj – Respondent
C.M.P.(MD)No.9941 of 2025 | Rev.Apl.C.(MD)No.SR50647 of 2025 | C.M.P.(MD)No.18961 of 2024 | A.S.(MD)No.SR56274 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN C.M.P.(MD)No.9941 of 2025 in Rev.Apl.C.(MD)No.SR50647 of 2025 in C.M.P.(MD)No.18961 of 2024 in A.S.(MD)No.SR56274 of 2023 M.Janet Amala Arul Jothi ... Petitioner Vs.
Samuel Raj ... Respondent Prayer in C.M.P.(MD)No.9941 of 2025 : Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 90 days in filing the present Review Application (MD) SR No.50647 of 2025 seeking to review of the order dated 20.02.2025 passed in C.M.P.(MD) No.18961 of 2024 in A.S.(MD)No.SR56274 of 2023 on the file of this Court.
Prayer in Rev.Apl.C.(MD)No.SR50647 of 2025 : Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, to review of the order dated 20.02.2025 passed in C.M.P.(MD) No.18961 of 2024 in A.S.(MD)No.SR56274 of 2023 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sankararamasubramanian
ORDER
(Order of the court was delivered by G.R.Swaminathan, J.)
This is only a petition to condone the delay in filing the review application. But there is zero merit in the review application. We are of the view that no purpose will be served in condoning the delay. Hence, the civil miscellaneous petition stands dismissed. Consequently, Rev.Apl.C.(MD)No.SR50647 of 2025 is also dismissed at SR stage itself.
No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.